Culture, Editor's Picks

We’re Calling It Self-Care. It’s Just Expensive Loneliness

By
March 30, 2026
Share this article

Somewhere between nightly magnesium mocktails and vision board parties, self-care stopped being an act of inward love and started being an outward performance of having it together.

Nobody resets on Sunday. They repackage the desired version of themselves in an effort to be seen as someone worth wanting. We’ve optimized straight past the point of feeling anything other than validation.

Wellness got rebranded in the process. The new pitch: become the person deserving of it. 

You know the one. Linen sheets pulled taut. A diffuser misting the scent of a forest you’ve never been to. Thirty-seven dollars of serum applied in an upward motion because downward is giving up. The whole ritual filmed, edited, soundtracked, and then posted with a caption about protecting your peace. Between the matcha and the mood board is the question nobody asks out loud: protected from what, exactly? For who?

Self-care has an origin story, and it’s not the one being sold. It comes from the Black feminist thought of Audre Lorde, writing in A Burst of Light that caring for herself was “not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare.” 

It was addressed to women whose bodies had been conscripted by everyone else’s needs first. Rest as resistance. Return to the body. The premise: the world is trying to use you up, and refusing that is a form of survival.

What happened next is the oldest story in America. They replicated the aesthetics, stripped the politics, and co-opted it. Tending to yourself in a world designed to exhaust you became synonymous with product hauls and GRWMs.  

The protection was real once. It just protected different people from different things, not from burnout or situationships, from a culture that had structured itself around depletion. That context didn’t survive the rebrand. It rarely does.

Wellness now: a personal brand category, an entry requirement, a signal you send that you’re valuable. 

The jade roller isn’t beauty maintenance anymore. It’s a personality trait. The cold plunge isn’t discipline…well, it is, but discipline is desirability in a world that has decided it’s attractive. The therapy? A green flag you wear on your sleeve so people know you’re working on it, which is the new shorthand for “I’m safe to get close to.”

The ritual isn’t the destination. It’s the application.

Wellness got aestheticized, aesthetics got monetized, and somewhere in that pipeline, taking care of yourself became indistinguishable from curating yourself. For a future partner. A better social circle. A more legible version of you that the right people would want access to.

Attainability is the product here, not wellness. Feeling better isn’t the aspiration; it’s to become the kind of person who has the time, taste, and disposable income to feel better in the right ways. Anyone can be exhausted and falling apart. But are you exhausted and falling apart with a Dyson Airwrap and a weekly Pilates membership? That registers differently. That’s a mess people prefer to be adjacent to.

The market understood this before we did, which is why every supplement brand suddenly sounds like the friend who has it figured out. It’s why wellness products are photographed like they live in the apartment of a person deeply, effortlessly loved. You’re buying into a visual language that says “I prioritize myself, which means I have something worth prioritizing,” and the subtext is always romantic, always social. 

Come find me at my most optimized.

The cruelest part is how thoroughly it evacuated the original premise. Self-care was intimate. It happened in private, or at least in small rooms with people who already knew you. Now it has to scale, because the product isn’t the care in itself but the legibility of the care. So the morning routine becomes content. The boundaries become an identity. The healing becomes a before-and-after. Is there a point if it doesn’t make you more attractive on the other side?

We’ve arrived at a culture where performing self-possession is how we define readiness to be with someone else. You broadcast solitude to prove you’re good company. The solitude gets photographed. Functionally, it’s a recruitment tool.

We take care of ourselves in public, carefully, beautifully, completely oriented toward an imagined observer. It’s a specific kind of loneliness, the architectural kind, where you’ve renovated your entire interior life around a permanent audience that doesn’t exist yet.

The yoga class without eye contact. The solo dinner on the grid. The skincare routine narrated to a phone propped against the mirror. We are deeply, expensively alone, and we have made it look so good that we’ve forgotten it’s supposed to bother us.

Demanding more? Subscribe for content that isn't intimidated by your standards.
Subscription Form
By subscribing to our newsletter, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

Register New Account